Sunday, April 14, 2013

Week 25 Reflection

This in our 25th week of chemistry Mr. Abud had ask all the question we had to so the class would be able to move forward and advance. I presume it just to make sure everyone understood the material, so we all could and be ready to go onto some new information for the 4th and final quarter at least for me. Some of the question that were asked were about ions, what are they made of and how do they bond, myself I already knew that. But a couple others were confused on how the opposite charges made a bond? Because if the charges are trying to neutralize each other and there can be an unequal amount of charges in one element how can they be made equal? Mr. Abud explained the amount of positive or negative charges must equal the other, if one element has more charges in a single atom then the other element with a smaller needs more of it to counter balance the equation. What I don’t understand what the difference between ionic and molecular bonds other than Ionic bond are made from a non-metal and a metal and a molecular bond is made form a metal and a metal. Other than that I don’t really know much about what the difference is. First he told that ions were formed from an overload of negative charges or a scarcity of positive charges. Then I learned that an ionic (or electrovalent) bond is formed between two ions of opposite charges. During the formation of an ionic bond, one of the reacting elements should form a positively charged ion (cation), and the other should give a negatively charged ion (anion). And that a molecular bond is formed well to tell the truth kind of forgot and didn’t write it down but ill ask him next! Anyway we got onto the top of conductivity and well that simple enough metals are very good conductors of electricity. And things that don’t conduct electricity are called insulators, which have low conductivity. Some examples of Isolators are wood, plastic, and rubber, which is why there are rubber layers over wires so we don’t get shocked because we as humans are conductors because of the electrons and water in our bodies, which is very conductive to electricity. Another interesting piece of information we learn and went over is that balloons when charged it will attract to insulators and nor conductors, I especially found this weird because if a balloon is charged with negative charges wouldn’t it want to attract positive charges like in a wall. The whole thing had me kind of confused… so I don’t remember, but again I will find out! I always do. Later in the week we did an electrolysis experiment with copper chloride. We were trying to see using electricity if we could separate the copper from the chlorine. We mixed the water and some substance in the container with metal rod, and would allow the electricity to flow. After making electricity run through the water, the copper would attract to the negatively charged rod, because copper has a plus 2 (2+) charge and that “opposites attract!” which we all were told in grade school. After we finished the experiment we dumped out the solution, we saw that we were right the copper stuck to the negatively charged rod. And chlorine attracted to the positively charged rod. The electricity split the two elements and the ionic compound with it. I find it funny how just a little electricity caused by friction by between gears and change something so small, but in turn it’s very fascinating! I can’t wait tot see what we do next! Till next time.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Week 24 Reflection

This week in chemistry class, Mr. Abud had us further our research on charges of atoms. In the beginning of the week he mentioned something about covalent bonds? I don’t remember much about them except that they are between elements and share the same electrons. Also that a covalent bond has a lattice structure, which means all the atoms are sharing electrons with another element. We also learned about ionic compounds, which are also held together by a lattice structure and is made up of a non-metal and a metal. What we going over in class was, we were trying top figure the charges in each compound. The idea was that there are a certain amount of atoms to each element to create a compound. Take water for example, or H2O: Hydrogen has a charge of plus one (1+) and oxygen has a charge minus one (1-) and the point is to balance them and get the charges equal to zero and to make a compound. But since oxygen has a plus 2 charge, for they’re to be a balance between charges, there must be two hydrogen atoms to stabilize the equation and make an ionic compound! The next day we got more into ions. See ions are atoms that have an unequal amount of a positive or negative charge. Mr. Abud says we talked about them at least a little in biology, but I don’t remember them at all… Of course with them the help of Mr. Abud everything is much clearer and I fully understand the process. It really does surprise me that chemists have discovered and created so many elements through this process of know charges. I am curious if the amount of charges has anything to do with the creation of an element? Would the molecular and empirical formulas have any factor in this? I’ll have to remember to ask Mr. Abud about it the next time were on the topic or when he isn’t to busy. Although, if the empirical formula does have something to do with the creation of elements… Then there wouldn’t be as many elements as there are now. Wouldn’t there? Another good question ill have to ask. There is one question I asked Mr. Abud, I asked him what was the purpose of alchemist? “Didn’t they try and change substances into something different or distort its original form?” He replied by saying just one sentence, “Alchemist only tried turning everything into gold.” And I could see why they’d want to, if they pulled that off America wouldn’t owe any money to China for the war. Making elements and compound just by trial and error has made the world we live ion today. It’s truly amazing why chemists do. So be good. Until next time!

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Week 23 Reflection

This week in chemistry we started talking about conductivity and the charges that deal with it. We first did an experiment with three regular lengths of scotch tape. We put a first piece of tape on the lab table with a little part hanging off and folded it over, so it would be easy to take pull off. Same with the second and third pieces of tape, which were placed on top of each other also with tabs folded over. We pulled the 2nd and 3rd apart and when we brought them back close to each other they attracted one another. “So obviously there is some kind of force! That is reacting upon them.” We tested the pieces of tape on other materials like tine foil and copper. Strangely when one piece of tape would attract the other would repel away. Next Mr. Abud took a glass rod and rubbed up against his tie and clearly making friction. But we charged the glass rod with wool and moved it toward the pieces of tape and again they were opposite (one attracted one repelled). This evidence was far along for Mr. Abud to tell us that there are things called charges. And these charges are very small things even smaller than an atom. I personally never thought there was something smaller than an atom; that shocked me completely! You see a charge is created by friction, which we demonstrated like before with the tie, glass rod and tape and there different charges. So now we have the identity of what is happening with charges, “We know that they are there” all around us on any surface, so stronger than other. But we still don’t have a completely understanding of how a charge even works. Mr. Abud asked to pull up a scientist called J.J. Thompson, we found out he was the man who worked on atoms and studied them profusely. His model is like saying atoms are suspended in a type of “plum pudding” with positive charges being the pudding goop and the negative charges being the fruit or nuts-I personally like to think of it as (yogurt) I’m not sure why, I just it’s an easier why of picturing it. After another day we weren't quite finished yet because if there is a positive and a negative that doesn't explain why there isn't an attraction between two objects such as: a pen and a piece of paper. When you rubbed paper or a pencil enough friction you only get fire! So why did the tape attract and then not attract to the glass rod before we ripped them apart? There must be neutral charges because if there weren't we all might be stuck to a wall. So when the tapes didn't attract before we ripped them, ripping them must caused friction between the two and caused the electrons to transfer over to one of them making the other wanting to attract or to stabilize the solution. I’m still learning about this so I apologize I’m ending it short, but till next time. Have a good read!

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Week 22 Reflection

This week in chemistry class the juniors where taking the ACT so the entire class was gone besides a few seniors and a couple sophomores. Of course it was also the week of the musical. So the main things on my mind were the musical and getting ready and making sure everything was perfect for the performances. I didn’t really attend school other than Monday and Friday. Which was kind of nice, but at the same time being out of school made myself miss a few things in some of my classes. So I understood most the work that we were doing in the projects, because it was from the previous week, although I was a bit lost in some of the stuff, so I asked someone and they explained it to me and it made much more sense. I regret to say I don’t remember much of the stuff we did this week because I was too busy with the musical and being so exhausted from it. Of course that’s no excuse for not doing your work. Because your education comes first” I knew that for the longest time but never really applied it to my school life. If I had I probably would’ve had better grades in freshman and sophomore years. Which has affected me in college plans. I’m trying hardest and when the results come, despite good or bad, but hen it comes own to that there’s nothing left for you to do. What will be… Will be.